|
Individualism and differences in the practice of
traditional medicine make it difficult to evaluate outcomes. Users of
traditional medicine are less concerned with questions of efficacy because they
believe traditional medicine works.
Two recent articles highlight the prevalence and uses of
traditional American Indian medicine.
1. In 1997,
Kim et al interviewed a Navajo HIS tribal
hospital in order to determine the prevalence of native healer use,
the reasons for use, cost of use, and the nature of any conflict with
conventional medicine.
The study found
high rates of alternative medicine use in the Navajo population. Most
patients interviewed had used native healers at some point and almost
40% used native healers on a regular basis. Patients consulted
both native healers and medical providers for a wide range of health
problems. Common conditions among the Navajo such as diabetes
mellitus, arthritis, and depression or anxiety were common reasons
for consulting both the medical provider and the native healer.
However, certain diseases such as upper respiratory tract infections
and allergies were recognized as the exclusive domain of the medical
provider and other problems such as bad luck, blessings, and family
difficulties were recognized as the exclusive domain of the native
healer. For diseases such as diabetes, native healer care was
viewed as an adjunct rather than a substitute for medical provider
care. The patients using native healers consulted native healers for
depression or anxiety a greater proportion of the time than patients
only using medical providers consulted medical providers for
depression or anxiety. As one patient stated, "The doctors give me
pills for my body, the medicine man gives me songs for my spirit."
Patients in this
study do not perceive conflict between different health system
beliefs and may use remedies prescribed by several practitioners for
a single health care problem; they may perceive such an approach as
more effective than using a single system. This may be rooted in the
belief that disease is multifaceted, and different health care
systems treat different facets effectively.
As one patient succinctly stated, "It is better to
stand on two legs than on one." Therefore, inquiring about patients'
use of native healers can significantly enhance understanding of the
patients' health. Even though use of native healers can be a religious and
private issue, patients are willing to discuss their use of native
healers if asked in a sensitive manner. Increased understanding of
this deeply rooted system can improve communications between
providers and patients and, therefore, can help medical providers
improve the quality of care provided.
2.
In 2004,
Novins et al attempted to describe
the use of biomedical services and traditional healing options among a
reservation-based sample of American Indians from 2 culturally distinct tribes.
American Indian tribes have a rich
history of traditional healing through consultation with medicine people and
ceremonies designed to intervene in the spiritual world to affect healing.
Traditional systems of healing are active in both of the tribes studied,
although the organization of traditional healing is quite different in each. The
Northern Plains tribe features a network of traditional healers that is
informally organized and whose practices center on a set of core ceremonies, any
1 of which could be indicated for multiple forms of distress. In contrast, the
Southwest tribe features a formally organized network of traditional healers who
perform carefully scripted ceremonies that often have very specific indications
based on the determination of a specific spiritual cause of an individual’s
distress. Although specialization is certainly a part of the Northern Plains
system of traditional healing, it is much less elaborated than in the Southwest,
where practitioners specialize in specific diagnostic practices and ceremonies.
The study found that use of traditional
healing was prevalent in both tribes—a much higher prevalence than that reported
for the use of complementary and alternative medicine among non-American Indian
samples. Clearly, traditional healing is an important and independent
source of care for American Indians from these 2 tribes.
Additionally, although the use of
traditional healing was prevalent in both tribes, we identified a number of
differences in the prevalence of the use of traditional healing and its use in
combination with, or independent of, biomedical services. These tribal
differences could be the result of the differing healing traditions of these 2
tribes. For example, it is possible that, because of its specificity,
traditional healing in the Southwest could be viewed as helpful for a greater
variety of physical health and psychiatric difficulties than in the Northern
Plains, and thus used more frequently. Also, the more formal organization of
traditional healing in the Southwest could facilitate the use of such practices.
Third, use of biomedical and traditional
services varied by problem type with traditional healing providing a greater
proportion of care for psychiatric than for physical health problems. This is
consistent with the literature regarding non-American Indian populations that
suggests that complementary and alternative medicine is often used for mental
health problems. Traditional healing could be viewed as particularly helpful for
psychiatric problems, resulting in their greater use for these difficulties.
Alternatively, the stigma of psychiatric problems and biomedical services for
these problems could drive American Indians with these difficulties to explore
traditional healing options first before consulting with a biomedical clinician.
These findings have important
implications for clinicians and researchers. For clinicians, use of traditional
healing is likely to be common among American Indians, particularly those with
psychiatric problems. Clinicians should include questions about traditional
healing in their assessments and consider with their patients the need for
coordinating their services. |