|
Perceived
Pros and Cons of Organic Food
Arguments for or against organic foods
are largely anecdotal and left to word of mouth. Here are a few arguments from
both sides. (Keep in mind, neither conventional nor organic production methods
are uniform, so care must be taken when interpreting these arguments.)
Pros:
Organic Farming
is good for the environment: numerous surveys have evaluated the
environmental impact of various farming methods1.
From these, a general consensus holds that: organic farms do not use synthetic
pesticides which can harm local wildlife; organic farms sustain diverse
ecosystems due to practices such as crop rotation; per unit area, organic farms
use less energy and produce less waste.
Organic Farming
is better for the food producers: The harmful effects of pesticide
exposure are well documented (see Study later). Even when they are used
properly, they still end up in the bodies of farmers and food handlers. Organic
techniques do not expose producers to dangerous organophosphate pesticides and
other dangerous chemicals.
Organic
Farming is better for consumers: a study
published by the National Research Council in 1993 reported that the primary
form of exposure to pesticides in children is via dietary intake. A more
recent 2006 study showed that organophosphate levels dropped immediately when
children were started on an organic diet (see studies section). According to the
Environmental Working Group (http://www.ewg.org)
eating the 12 most contaminated fruits and vegetables exposes one to
about 20 pesticides per day on average. Eating the 12 least contaminated foods
exposes you to about 2 pesticides per day on average. Further, a study
from 2005 in which umbilical cord blood was sampled showed that 21 commonly used
pesticides can cross the placenta2.
Cons:
Food Safety:
One of the largest arguments for purchasing organic food has been the simple
fact
that organic foods contain less pesticide and pesticide residues. One study
published in 2002 claimed that organic foods have one third the pesticides of
conventionally grown foods1.
BUT, the federal government already has standards for allowable amounts of
pesticide residues, and conventional foods are well under those levels. In
addition, the long term effects of ingesting miniscule amounts of pesticides are
unknown, and conclusions about such exposure are questionable at best.
Sustainability:
Many of the advantages of organic farming have been attributed to crop
rotation which is NOT and exclusively organic farming technique. In addition,
one of the newest techniques, no-till farming, is a decidedly conventional
practice and it uses the least energy. In this technique, herbicides are used to
clear land which means that all the energy used to till and manage land in the
usual technique can be saved and used for other purposes.
Organic
Food is Too Expensive: perhaps the single best argument against organic
food is that it is just too costly. On average, consumers pay 50% more for
organic products and up to 100% more for organic meat and dairy products2.
|